Ordering


Weekly Thought | Site Map | Curriculum | Article and Essay Workshop | Contact Us | Links



Return to
Home Page

Education Support Services
Thought of the Week Archives
December 2000

December 4, 2000

If we are serious about becoming free in our lives, we are forced at some point to go over the edge -- to undertake a great act of surrender. This amounts to a profound leap of faith. At some point, something happens that forces us to let go of our attachment to everything we ever did, everything we ever thought, and all the momentum, effort, work, and development we ever imagined we were creating. We are forced to give up everything we thought we had done and everything we thought we were, discovering in the process that the reasons we thought we had for doing these things now seem ridiculous.
Swami Chetanananda

Will I Be the Hero of My Own Life (p. 95)

December 11, 2000

[French philosopher Michael Foucault used Jeremey Bentham's panopticon prison design, which would keep prisoners under observation 24 hours per day, to explain how constant observation can be used for subjugation.]
In contrast to [force] you have the system of serveillance, which...involves very little expense. There is no need for arms, physical violence, material constraints. Just a gaze. An inspecting gaze, a gaze which each individual under its weight will end by interiorising to the point that he is his own overseer, each individual thus exercising this surveillance over, and against, himself. A superb formula: power exercised continuously and for what turns out to be a mimimarl cost. When Benthan realises what he has discovered, he calls it the Colombus's egg of political thought, a formula exactly the opposite of monarchial power. It is indeed the case that the gaze has had great importance among techniques of power developed in the modern era, but, as I have said, it is far from being the only or even the principal system employed.
Michael Foucault

Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other Writings (p. 155)

Comment:

This constant gaze, constant serveillance, is what standardized testing is doing to schools. These tests are a means of serveillance, and the more teachers keep them in mind while they are planning and teaching, the more they internalize the power of the system and become their own intellectual "prison guards." There really is no conspiracy involved. The mechanistic system perpetuates itself by creating the need for standardization, for workers trained and conditioned to fit it when they live school. It would seem that this power is being exercised against the individual (teacher and student). It is. But by doing what the system needs, we actually are exercising the power even while the power is exercised against us. It is a self-perpetuating loop. I doubt that this standardizing, dehumanizing loop will be broken "out there," in real life. The school is the only place it can be controlled, but the testing, the standardizing, the defining of the ways we must understand life by the structure of the test, is finally destroying the school's ability to function as an agent of social observation and critique. All this is accomplished by putting schools, teachers, and students under constant observation. Foucault calls this "power through transparency", subjection by "illumanation." It makes people unable and unwilling to do anything which the system would find wrong.
Reg Harris

Comments?

December 18, 2000

In the first quarter of this century, something crucial happened to thinking people. Let us call it "the interpretive turn." The turn first expressed itself in drama and literature, then in history, then in the social sciences, and finally in epistemology. It is now expressing itself in education. The object of interpretation is understanding, not explanation; its instrument is the analysis of text. Understanding is the outcome of organizing and contextualizing essentially contestable, incompletely verifiable propositions in a disciplined way. One of our principal means for doing so is through narrative: by telling a story of what something is "about." But as Kierkegaard had made clear many years before, telling stories in order to understand is no mere enrichment of the mind: without them we are, to use his phrase, reduced to fear and trembling.
Understanding, unlike explaining, is not preemptive: one way of construing the fall of Rome narratively does not preclude other ways. Nor does the interpretation of any particular narrative rule out other interpretations. For narratives and their interpretations traffic in meaning, and meanings are intransigently multiple: the rule is polysemy. Narrative meanings, moreover, depend in only a trivial way on truth in the strict sense of verifiability. The requirement, rather, is verisimilitude or "truth likeness," and that is a compound of coherence and pragmatic utility, neither of which can be rigidly specified.
Jerome Bruner

The Culture of Education (p. 90)

December 25, 2000 

Living is seen as a continual process of completing gestalten, of completing wholes. The example Perls gives is that of a person reading a book. The book is the figure, the reader's body is the background. As he reads, he becomes aware that he is thirsty. The sensation of thirst is his throat now emerges as figural, and the book becomes part of the background. Perhaps our reader now imagines a glass of water or a can of beer. He gets up, satisfies his thirst, and returns to his reading. His actions have been determined by his need, the need of his organism to be in a state of balance, a state of wholeness. Thus, needs organize perception and behavior. The parallel with the learning situation is obvious. If there is no need to know, learning will not take place. Gestalt learning theory deals with creating such needs; it also deals with the obstacles, such as repressions, fantasies, and other blockages, which prohibit these needs from emerging naturally. Thus, Gestalt learning theory concerns itself not only with learning about the world, but with learning how we prevent ourselves from doing so.
McCarthy, David N.
"Gestalt as Learning Theory,"
in The Live Classroom, Yomans, Thomas, and Grizzard, Liles, ed.



Home Page | Order | Curriculum Outline | Site Map | Article and Essay Workshop
Contact Us | Feedback
Comments or Questions about this site? Contact Reg Harris