
Return
to
Home Page
|

Education Support Services
Thought of the Week
March 2001
March 5
The original satisfaction of primary narcissism, said Freud, is established
in the psyche as a memory, which then becomes a model or schema, preserved
as an "idea," for what is sought in later life. As Freud described it,
the memory of this satisfaction becomes established in the mind as a concrete
"thing," which the person either identifies with or tries to re-create.
This concretization of experience, which the thinking mind is so expert
at carrying out, is what the Buddhists call ignorance. ...
The the self, according to the Buddha's langauge of the ancient Sutras,
is a fiction -- a mirage, a shadow, or a dream. ..."The mind," echoed
the sixth Zen patriarch, Hui-neng, in the seventh century A.D., "is at
bottom an imagination." And, "since imagination is the same as illusion,"
he concluded, "there is nothing to be attached to."
- Mark Epstein, M.D.
Thoughts without a thinker, (p. 87)
March 12, 2001
Man is all the time outside of himself: it is in the projecting and
losing himself beyond himself that he makes man to exist; and, on the
other hand, it is by pursuing transcendent aims that he himself is able
to exist. Since man is thus self-surpassing, he is himself the heart and
center of his transcendence. There is no other universe except the human
universe, the universe of human subjectivity.
This is humanism, because we remind man that there is no legislator
but himself; that he himself, thus abandoned, must decide for himself;
also because we show that it is not by turning back upon himself, but
always by seeking, beyond himself, an aim, which is one of liberation
or of some particular realization, that man can realize himself as truly
human.
- Jean-Paul Sartre
Existentialism and Humanism
Comment:
Existentially, there is no universe but the subjective universe, the
universe as we experience it in our minds through the vehicle of our senses.
To exist as "I", a being separate from other beings, we must exist actively
as an object against a ground of everything that is "not
I." To lock ourselves in ourselves, in our own subjectivity, is to remove
our relationship with the ground of our existence (not-I).
So to exist, we must transcend, go beyond, the sense of "I" as object
and throw ourselves into the ground of "not-I", to experience our own
being, our own separateness. But the separateness that is "I" is not independent
of the ground "not-I." They coexist, are really polar perceptions of being-non-being.
So to exist, we must transcend the monopolar nature of self and exist
in the unified bi-polar self/not-self.
To realize something is to make it real, which is to place it in the
field of all that is "not real." To realize the self, we must know the
"not self." As Sartre says leter, "it is not by turning back upon himself,
but by seeking beyond, that man can realize himself as truly human."
This, I think is the essence of the Heroic Journey process. It is the
pattern of our constant equilibrium with "not-self." As we change, our
relationship changes, and so requires adjustment. That adjustment takes
the form of the Journey. As Sartre says, "it is only by seeking beyond
ourselves" that we experience ourselves as individuals. This is why accepting
the calls to our journeys is critical to mental health. Otherwise we lose
the experience of our own existence.
I will write more later on this idea and its possible relationship
to literature.
Reg Harris
- Comments? Click here.
March 19
Fantasy images that are the stuff and values of soul are structured
by archetypes. They "direct all fantasy activity into its appointed paths,"
says Jung. These paths are mythological; or rather, we see that fantasy
flows into particular motifs (mythologems) and constellations of persons
in action (mythemes). These patternings appear in myths the world over,
and in literature, art, scientific theories, and theological doctrines;
also in dreams, even the dreams of children, and in the delusional systems
of the insane -- wherever imagination manifests itself in the products
of the mind. Within these fantasy-miages are the archetypal persons of
myths. Their interrelations are the structural principles of psychic life.
- James Hillman
Re-Visioning Psychology (p. 23)
March 26
In terms of education, how do we work with this model? How does this
personality function in the classroom? The main lines of this process
have been implied, but let us go over them now more explicitly.
First of all, if we reconceive education in terms of what we have said
here, it becomes a "leading out" of an individual's capacities, talents,
uniqueness, person, into his whole possibilities, and its aim becomes
the balanced development of the personality toward intellectual, emotional,
social, and moral maturity. As such, education clearly becomes person-centered,
rather than oriented to the teaching of subject matter, skills or disciplines,
per se -- which is not to say we are abandoning these disciplines, but
only that we are putting them in a secondary position to the learner himself.
The student's experience is primary, the foundation on which he builds
his education. Questions such as "Who am I?" "What do I want?" "What has
meaning?" become vitally important and central to the process of education
and must be dealt with fully and directly. ...to do this a student needs
to find and experience his center, become aware of his personality aspects
and subpersonalities and how they operate, assess his blocks, conflicts,
and polarities, and then begin the work of growing, using the processes
of awareness, energy, assimilation, and confluence.
...the primary thrust here is toward self-awareness and understanding,
for this is the foundation on which his education will be built.
- Thomas Yoemans
"Search for a Working Model: Gestalt, Psychosynthesis, and Confluent Education"
The Live Classroom: Innovation through Confluent Education and Gestalt,
ed. Brown, George Isaac (pp. 151-152)
|
|